Register

Welcome to the RDI-Board Community.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.


Donate Now Goal amount for this month: 100 EUR, Received: 100 EUR (100%)
Donate to support this site...

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: SS2 vs Humaz

  1. #1
    Junior Member Friend
    RDI - Board Default Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United Arab Emirates
    Posts
    41
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Default SS2 vs Humaz


    Pls let me know which one is good or which can open most channel in hotbird - SS2 (for pc) OR Humaz. Thanks in advance for yr valuable replies.

  2. #2
    Platinum member Expert
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    21.95° N 97.06° E
    Posts
    6,263
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Default

    I think SS2 is more than good to use.(my opinion)


    Thanks.
    " 李俊明 Born To Help People "

    DM 500s , Pacific 3600 CI , Humax F2 Finder , Angel Box , My Dream Machine , Tatasky , KAON , Topfield 3030 , Yuri YR1Dap , Dynasat 7100 , F1 , Plus and II , Metabox II , 10 , Viva Vs 9000 , SkyBox II , X-Sat 430 , 420 , Bolt N2 , NewB , New Shine Ns 3000 , Victory V 889 , F1 Newshine , New Star , Innovia 3088 CA , Atom 7000 , PBI , Prosat , Dstv 3Q76 , GA 88a , Tatasky , Big Tv , Airtel .



  3. #3
    Platinum member Expert
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29°20'N 47°59'E
    Posts
    5,711
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Default

    consider SS2 as the cheaper alternative to the more pricey dreambox.
    HP-Compaq DC5000 MT 1.5GB RAM
    Debian Squeeze with Smargos
    CCcam 2.1.4

  4. #4
    Junior Member Friend
    RDI - Board Default Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United Arab Emirates
    Posts
    41
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Default Thanks

    Thanks for the reply. If anybody knows more comparison between these two, pls explain.

  5. #5
    Platinum member Expert
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    29°20'N 47°59'E
    Posts
    5,711
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Default

    basically you cannot compare the two. other than both can get almost the same channel using softcam.key and humax may be able to connect also to the internet (don't know the exact success rate of this method) to a gbox server, the similarities end there. humax cannot record to a hdd (at least not the 5400z). humax cannot decode data streams for offline grabbing, etc etc.
    HP-Compaq DC5000 MT 1.5GB RAM
    Debian Squeeze with Smargos
    CCcam 2.1.4

  6. #6
    Member Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    pakistan
    Posts
    532
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Default

    i think dcw sharing is also possible only on ss2 not on dreambox or humax.and u can also record plenty of data to ur hdd with ss2.in my view ss2 is the best thing to watch encrypted channels.

  7. #7
    Junior Member Friend
    RDI - Board Default Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United Arab Emirates
    Posts
    41
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Default Thanks


    Thanks to eveybody for the explanation of my question.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to Top