Welcome to the RDI-Board Community.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Donate Now Goal amount for this month: 100 EUR, Received: 10 EUR (10%)
Donate to support this site...

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Member Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Default ESA Engineers Hack Their Own Satellite

    The Samba, one in four satellites that the European Space Agency (ESA) sent up in 2000, was thought to be a lost cause when the five power switches in one of its main instruments locked close. ESA controllers in Darmstadt, Germany knew that this was an unrecoverable condition, which was made worse by the knowledge that the loss of this satellite could invalidate the data sent in by the other three.

    Power switches on Samba's Wave Experiment Consortium (WEC) instrument cluster locked in March. ESA engineers and ground controllers feared that the cause behind the lock was a paralysing short circuit. Working with dormant software, and knowing that systems can be made to do things they aren't supposed to, engineers hacked into their own satellite.

    “The solution was based on a 'dirty hack,'” said Jürgen Vlopp, Cluster Operations Manager of ESA, referring to anything that isn't considered standard operating procedure. “but we had no other option.”

    Their dirty hack brought the Samba back to life, restarting its WEC, letting the ESA continue their study.

    ESA Head of Mission Operations Manfred Warhaut said: “When everything goes as planned, flying a mission can be routine, but when unexpected trouble occurs, and there's nothing in the manuals, you really want to have an experience and talented team on hand to solve the problem.”

    Samba and the other satellites in its quartet were sent up to carry out specialist analysis of solar winds, study and research of which is ongoing.

  2. #2
    Gold Member Expert
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts Thanks / Likes

    Talking 'dirty hack' – jargon referring to any non-standard procedure

    'Dirty hack' restores Cluster mission from near loss
    30 June 2011

    Image above: Cluster satellites study the effects of solar wind

    Using ingenuity and an unorthodox 'dirty hack', ESA has recovered the four-satellite Cluster mission from near loss. The drama began in March, when a crucial science package stopped responding to commands – one of a mission controller's worst fears.

    Since a pair of spectacular dual launches in 2000, the four Cluster satellites have been orbiting Earth in tightly controlled formation. Each of the 550 kg satellites carries an identical payload to investigate Earth's space environment and its interaction with the solar wind – the stream of charged particles pouring out from the Sun.

    Among each satellite's 11 instruments, five comprise the Wave Experiment Consortium (WEC), which makes important measurements of electrical and magnetic fields. All four sensors must work together to make carefully orchestrated observations – the loss of any one could seriously affect the unique 'four-satellite science' delivered by the mission.

    On 5 March, the WEC package on Cluster's number 3 satellite, Samba, failed to switch on. Ground controllers at ESA's European Space Operations Centre, in Darmstadt, Germany, immediately triggered a series of standard recovery procedures, none of which succeeded.

    Even worse, no status information could be coaxed out of the instruments.

    Dangerous scenario for orbiting satellite

    Image above: Engineers working in Cluster control room

    "With no status data and no response from the instrument, we suspected either that the device's five power switches were locked closed or a failure caused by an electrical short circuit, one of the most dangerous faults on any satellite," said ESA's Jürgen Volpp, Cluster operations manager.

    Over the next several weeks, working closely with the satellites' builder, the WEC scientists and manufacturer, and other ESA teams, the Cluster control team diagnosed the problem, eventually making use of some onboard software that had been dormant since just after launch over 10 years ago.

    The result ruled out a short circuit and pointed an accusing finger at the five power switches being locked in the 'closed' position.

    Tests in 1995 had simulated what might happen if three of the five switches locked close, but no one ever considered how to recover from all five being locked – such a situation had not been deemed possible.

    Armed with this information and a great deal of ingenuity, the team painstakingly designed a recovery procedure and tested it on one of Samba's functioning sister satellites.

    Image above: Five instruments in the WEC package on each Cluster satellite

    Solution based on a 'dirty hack'

    "The solution was based on a 'dirty hack' – jargon referring to any non-standard procedure – but we really had no other option," said Jürgen.

    Finally, on 1 June, in a very tense mission control room, a series of commands was radioed up. To immense relief, these flipped the power switches to 'on' and the recalcitrant WEC came back to life.

    Cluster has since returned to normal operation and measures are being taken to prevent this failure from happening again.

    "When everything goes as planned, flying a mission can be routine," said ESA's Manfred Warhaut, Head of Mission Operations. "But when unexpected trouble occurs, and there's nothing in the manuals, you really want to have an experienced and talented team on hand to solve the problem."

    “When unexpected trouble occurs, you really want to have an experienced and talented team on hand to solve the problem.”

    (Source: ESA )



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to Top